Har subah sirf utho mat Jaago Re TATA TEA

UP government is going to start entrance process for basic teacher training(BTC) for 17000 seats from july 2010(source Amar Ujala News Paper Dated-03 May 2010).SCERT(state council for educational research and training) has sent a proposal to the government to select the candidates for BTC on the basis of merit(10th,12th and graduation marks). 

But I and a lot of people like me have following objections.

1.Different boards/universities candidate will apply for BTC. how can we compare different board/university students on the basis of their marks. each board or university has different syllabus,different marking pattern.this can be easily proved by seeing past results,boards guideline for evaluation and by seeing syllabus of the same class. for example- a up board student of class twelve has combined syllabus for eleventh and twelth class and has to prepare both year syllabus for 12th board exam while CBSE student has different syllabus for 11th and 12th.

2. my second objection is students of different streams of the same board/university or different board/university and of same stream but with different subjects can not be compared. some subjects are more scoring than others.this can be easily seen by checking past record. for example students who have home science, music etc subjects will get higher marks than a economics' s student marks. some subjects have practical components and the students who have practical subjects easily get higher marks in practical component. 

3.professional courses can not be compared with academic courses.professional courses has two types of evaluation. first internal and second- university based exam evaluation. in internal marking system most of the students easily get 80 to 100% marks. so a BCA ,BBA student can not be compared with a B.A. student whose evaluation is done only on the basis of university exam.

3-the student of same board or different board/university passing in different years can not be compared.education sector is changing at very fast pace. every year something new has been added and the facilities ,teacher method , evaluation method, syllabus and the government also are changing.so we can see the result of these changes on the marks of the students.

_ In up board when i passed the high school in 1999 , the Kalyan Singh led BJP government was there.CM kalyan Singh introduced nakal adyadesh(ordinance) .if any body found copying would had to go to jail. that year highschool result was only 29%.

_ Up to1999 there was a combined syllabus for 9th and 10th and 10th student had to prepare for both year syllabus for 10th exam.the marking pattern has also changed. in earlier time in maths and science no marks were given if the answer is wrong but now step marking is done and marks is given for right steps without considering answer is wrong or right. 

_now in UP nakal mafia is on high. there are several instances of paper leaks, group copying etc.

_besides these there are varying infrastructure in villages, small cities and big cities that affect the mark securing ability of the students in their early stage of education.but they are in no ways less intelligent for the other students who are securing more marks. 

i want to know about all of you views and if you are agree with my objections than how can you and bharat swabhiman sanghatan help about the matter.

so in the light of above objections i want to file a PIL(public interest litigation) .i am an unemployed youth and don't have sufficient resources to file a PIL.So can bharat swbhiman sanghatan help me in filling a PIL about the said matter because it's matter of lacs of unemployed youth. 

Puneet Saxena 

12-tilak colony 

rampur